↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Controlled ovarian stimulation protocols for assisted reproduction: a network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
Controlled ovarian stimulation protocols for assisted reproduction: a network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012586
Authors

Ioannis D Gallos, Abey Eapen, Malcolm J Price, Sesh Kamal Sunkara, Nick S Macklon, Siladitya Bhattacharya, Yacoub Khalaf, Aurelio Tobias, Jonathan J Deeks, Madhurima Rajkhowa, Arri Coomarasamy

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 19%
Student > Master 12 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 20 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 21 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2021.
All research outputs
#4,668,887
of 17,606,952 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,028
of 11,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,510
of 267,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#172
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,606,952 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.