↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Physical conditioning as part of a return to work strategy to reduce sickness absence for workers with back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
500 Mendeley
Title
Physical conditioning as part of a return to work strategy to reduce sickness absence for workers with back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001822.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frederieke G Schaafsma, Karyn Whelan, Allard J van der Beek, Ludeke C van der Es-Lambeek, Anneli Ojajärvi, Jos H Verbeek

Abstract

Physical conditioning as part of a return to work strategy aims to improve work status for workers on sick leave due to back pain. This is the second update of a Cochrane Review (originally titled 'Work conditioning, work hardening and functional restoration for workers with back and neck pain') first published in 2003, updated in 2010, and updated again in 2013.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 500 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 498 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 96 19%
Student > Bachelor 70 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 10%
Researcher 48 10%
Student > Postgraduate 36 7%
Other 95 19%
Unknown 103 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 147 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 97 19%
Psychology 28 6%
Sports and Recreations 27 5%
Social Sciences 21 4%
Other 63 13%
Unknown 117 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,077,653
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,487
of 12,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,071
of 199,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#93
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.