↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Physical conditioning as part of a return to work strategy to reduce sickness absence for workers with back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
5 policy sources
twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
551 Mendeley
Title
Physical conditioning as part of a return to work strategy to reduce sickness absence for workers with back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001822.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frederieke G Schaafsma, Karyn Whelan, Allard J van der Beek, Ludeke C van der Es‐Lambeek, Anneli Ojajärvi, Jos H Verbeek

Abstract

Physical conditioning as part of a return to work strategy aims to improve work status for workers on sick leave due to back pain. This is the second update of a Cochrane Review (originally titled 'Work conditioning, work hardening and functional restoration for workers with back and neck pain') first published in 2003, updated in 2010, and updated again in 2013.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 551 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 549 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 99 18%
Student > Bachelor 68 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 9%
Researcher 49 9%
Student > Postgraduate 36 7%
Other 96 17%
Unknown 152 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 148 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 97 18%
Psychology 30 5%
Sports and Recreations 29 5%
Social Sciences 19 3%
Other 62 11%
Unknown 166 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,781,427
of 26,038,372 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,676
of 13,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,954
of 213,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#79
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,038,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.