↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Efficacy of psychostimulant drugs for amphetamine abuse or dependence

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy of psychostimulant drugs for amphetamine abuse or dependence
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009695.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clara Pérez-Mañá, Xavier Castells, Marta Torrens, Dolors Capellà, Magi Farre

Abstract

Amphetamine dependence is a public health problem with medical, psychiatric, cognitive, legal and socioeconomic consequences. To date, no pharmacological treatment has been approved for this disorder, and psychotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment. In recent years, psychostimulants have been investigated as a possible replacement therapy.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 209 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Researcher 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 39 19%
Unknown 38 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 35%
Psychology 23 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Other 36 17%
Unknown 46 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,426,866
of 18,197,021 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,549
of 11,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,611
of 171,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,197,021 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.