↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Occupational safety and health enforcement tools for preventing occupational diseases and injuries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
21 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
278 Mendeley
Title
Occupational safety and health enforcement tools for preventing occupational diseases and injuries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010183.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina Mischke, Jos H Verbeek, Jenny Job, Thais C Morata, Anne Alvesalo-Kuusi, Kaisa Neuvonen, Simon Clarke, Robert I Pedlow

Abstract

There is uncertainty as to whether and what extent occupational safety and health regulation and legislation enforcement activities, such as inspections, are effective and efficient to improve workers' health and safety. We use the term regulation to refer both to regulation and legislation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 272 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 13%
Researcher 23 8%
Student > Postgraduate 18 6%
Student > Bachelor 16 6%
Other 60 22%
Unknown 78 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 20%
Social Sciences 27 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 16 6%
Engineering 13 5%
Other 47 17%
Unknown 93 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,374,588
of 23,674,309 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,136
of 12,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,438
of 200,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#70
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,674,309 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.