↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Occupational safety and health enforcement tools for preventing occupational diseases and injuries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
20 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
264 Mendeley
Title
Occupational safety and health enforcement tools for preventing occupational diseases and injuries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010183.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina Mischke, Jos H Verbeek, Jenny Job, Thais C Morata, Anne Alvesalo-Kuusi, Kaisa Neuvonen, Simon Clarke, Robert I Pedlow

Abstract

There is uncertainty as to whether and what extent occupational safety and health regulation and legislation enforcement activities, such as inspections, are effective and efficient to improve workers' health and safety. We use the term regulation to refer both to regulation and legislation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 258 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 13%
Researcher 22 8%
Student > Postgraduate 18 7%
Student > Bachelor 16 6%
Other 61 23%
Unknown 65 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 10%
Social Sciences 27 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 16 6%
Environmental Science 13 5%
Other 49 19%
Unknown 78 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,318,488
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,043
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,376
of 199,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#63
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.