↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Fibrinogen concentrate in bleeding patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
281 Mendeley
Title
Fibrinogen concentrate in bleeding patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008864.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne Wikkelsø, Jens Lunde, Mathias Johansen, Jakob Stensballe, Jørn Wetterslev, Ann Merete Møller, Arash Afshari

Abstract

Hypofibrinogenaemia is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, but the optimal treatment level, the use of preemptive treatment and the preferred source of fibrinogen remain disputed. Fibrinogen concentrate is increasingly used and recommended for bleeding with acquired haemostatic deficiencies in several countries, but evidence is lacking regarding indications, dosing, efficacy and safety.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 277 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 13%
Student > Master 35 12%
Other 29 10%
Student > Bachelor 29 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 8%
Other 73 26%
Unknown 56 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 137 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 7%
Psychology 11 4%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Unspecified 9 3%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 71 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2020.
All research outputs
#3,542,863
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,079
of 11,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,980
of 212,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#127
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.