The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Fibrinogen concentrate in bleeding patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008864.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anne Wikkelsø, Jens Lunde, Mathias Johansen, Jakob Stensballe, Jørn Wetterslev, Ann Merete Møller, Arash Afshari |
| Abstract |
Hypofibrinogenaemia is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, but the optimal treatment level, the use of preemptive treatment and the preferred source of fibrinogen remain disputed. Fibrinogen concentrate is increasingly used and recommended for bleeding with acquired haemostatic deficiencies in several countries, but evidence is lacking regarding indications, dosing, efficacy and safety. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 30% |
| Spain | 2 | 20% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 288 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 284 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 12% |
| Researcher | 34 | 12% |
| Other | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 9% |
| Other | 68 | 24% |
| Unknown | 67 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 135 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 7% |
| Psychology | 12 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 26 | 9% |
| Unknown | 83 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2020.
All research outputs
#3,774,352
of 26,617,918 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,294
of 13,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,730
of 214,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#125
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,617,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.