↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for uncomplicated biliary colic

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
Title
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for uncomplicated biliary colic
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007196.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Rahul Koti, Giuseppe Fusai, Brian R Davidson

Abstract

Uncomplicated biliary colic is one of the commonest indications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy involves several months of waiting if performed electively. However, people can develop life-threatening complications during this waiting period.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 218 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 14%
Student > Bachelor 24 11%
Researcher 22 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 9%
Other 17 8%
Other 38 17%
Unknown 68 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 108 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 76 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2016.
All research outputs
#7,387,249
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,415
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,959
of 207,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#206
of 290 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 290 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.