↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for uncomplicated biliary colic

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
Title
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for uncomplicated biliary colic
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007196.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Rahul Koti, Giuseppe Fusai, Brian R Davidson

Abstract

Uncomplicated biliary colic is one of the commonest indications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy involves several months of waiting if performed electively. However, people can develop life-threatening complications during this waiting period.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 157 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 18%
Researcher 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 11%
Other 14 9%
Other 32 20%
Unknown 26 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 35 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2013.
All research outputs
#3,177,154
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,542
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,630
of 156,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#55
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.