↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Caesarean section versus vaginal delivery for preterm birth in singletons

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
24 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
423 Mendeley
Title
Caesarean section versus vaginal delivery for preterm birth in singletons
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000078.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zarko Alfirevic, Stephen J Milan, Stefania Livio

Abstract

Planned caesarean delivery for women thought be in preterm labour may be protective for baby, but could also be quite traumatic for both mother and baby. The optimal mode of delivery of preterm babies for both cephalic and breech presentation remains, therefore, controversial.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 423 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 416 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 57 13%
Student > Bachelor 54 13%
Unspecified 42 10%
Researcher 41 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 10%
Other 106 25%
Unknown 82 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 174 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 48 11%
Unspecified 42 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 3%
Psychology 12 3%
Other 39 9%
Unknown 94 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,140,610
of 22,647,730 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,618
of 12,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,903
of 198,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#51
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,647,730 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.