| Title |
Day hospital versus outpatient care for people with schizophrenia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003240.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elena Shek, Airton T Stein, Flavio M Shansis, Max Marshall, Ruth Crowther, Peter Tyrer |
| Abstract |
This review considers the use of day hospitals as an alternative to outpatient care. Two types of day hospital are covered by the review: 'day treatment programmes' and 'transitional' day hospitals. Day treatment programmes offer more intense treatment for people who have failed to respond to outpatient care. Transitional day hospitals offer time-limited care to people who have just been discharged from inpatient care. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 154 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 13% |
| Researcher | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 17% |
| Unknown | 37 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 21% |
| Psychology | 29 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Unknown | 43 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2017.
All research outputs
#2,864,701
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,559
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,246
of 93,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.