↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Day hospital versus outpatient care for people with schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
Title
Day hospital versus outpatient care for people with schizophrenia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003240.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elena Shek, Airton T Stein, Flavio M Shansis, Max Marshall, Ruth Crowther, Peter Tyrer

Abstract

This review considers the use of day hospitals as an alternative to outpatient care. Two types of day hospital are covered by the review: 'day treatment programmes' and 'transitional' day hospitals. Day treatment programmes offer more intense treatment for people who have failed to respond to outpatient care. Transitional day hospitals offer time-limited care to people who have just been discharged from inpatient care.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 148 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 15%
Student > Bachelor 21 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 13%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 34 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 21%
Psychology 28 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 13%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 40 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2017.
All research outputs
#2,423,208
of 19,645,988 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,123
of 11,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,519
of 180,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#42
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,645,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.