↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Day hospital versus outpatient care for people with schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
Title
Day hospital versus outpatient care for people with schizophrenia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003240.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elena Shek, Airton T Stein, Flavio M Shansis, Max Marshall, Ruth Crowther, Peter Tyrer

Abstract

This review considers the use of day hospitals as an alternative to outpatient care. Two types of day hospital are covered by the review: 'day treatment programmes' and 'transitional' day hospitals. Day treatment programmes offer more intense treatment for people who have failed to respond to outpatient care. Transitional day hospitals offer time-limited care to people who have just been discharged from inpatient care.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 124 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 14%
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 21 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 24%
Psychology 25 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 13%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 25 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2017.
All research outputs
#1,913,884
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,132
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,980
of 159,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.