↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Olanzapine versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters
weibo
1 weibo user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
165 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
413 Mendeley
Title
Olanzapine versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006654.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katja Komossa, Christine Rummel-Kluge, Heike Hunger, Franziska Schmid, Sandra Schwarz, Lorna Duggan, Werner Kissling, Stefan Leucht

Abstract

In many countries of the industrialised world second generation ("atypical") antipsychotics have become the first line drug treatment for people with schizophrenia. The question as to whether, and if so how much, the effects of the various second generation antipsychotics differ is a matter of debate. In this review we examined how the efficacy and tolerability of olanzapine differs from that of other second generation antipsychotics.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 413 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 396 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 70 17%
Researcher 63 15%
Student > Bachelor 49 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 7%
Other 84 20%
Unknown 79 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 158 38%
Psychology 48 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 22 5%
Other 45 11%
Unknown 91 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,336,203
of 21,347,849 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,924
of 12,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,449
of 185,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,347,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,071 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.