↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Miniports versus standard ports for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Miniports versus standard ports for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006804.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Jessica Vaughan, Rajarajan Ramamoorthy, Giuseppe Fusai, Brian R Davidson

Abstract

In conventional (standard) port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, four abdominal ports (two of 10 mm diameter and two of 5 mm diameter) are used. Recently, use of smaller ports, miniports, have been reported.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 28 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Psychology 4 4%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 31 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2014.
All research outputs
#20,661,136
of 25,389,116 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,930
of 12,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,782
of 208,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#234
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,389,116 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,736 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.