↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

D-Penicillamine for preventing retinopathy of prematurity in preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
Title
D-Penicillamine for preventing retinopathy of prematurity in preterm infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001073.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mosarrat J Qureshi, Manoj Kumar

Abstract

The rate of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in moderately premature infants has decreased dramatically with improved care in the neonatal intensive care unit. A low rate of this disorder was unexpectedly observed among infants treated with intravenous D-penicillamine to prevent hyperbilirubinaemia. This observation led to the investigation of its use, both enterally as well as intravenously, to prevent ROP.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Unknown 115 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 17%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Researcher 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 24 21%
Unknown 29 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 15%
Psychology 4 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 28 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2013.
All research outputs
#13,336,125
of 21,347,849 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,145
of 12,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,093
of 186,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#79
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,347,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,071 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.