↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Piracetam for acute ischaemic stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Piracetam for acute ischaemic stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000419.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefano Ricci, Maria Grazia Celani, Teresa Anna Cantisani, Enrico Righetti

Abstract

Piracetam has neuroprotective and antithrombotic effects that may help to reduce death and disability in people with acute stroke. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 1999, and previously updated in 2006 and 2009.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 24%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 10 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 31%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 12 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2021.
All research outputs
#977,218
of 17,638,294 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,548
of 11,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,716
of 176,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,638,294 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.