↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
43 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
377 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010192.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liam Bourke, Kate E Homer, Mohamed A Thaha, Liz Steed, Derek J Rosario, Karen A Robb, John M Saxton, Stephanie JC Taylor

Abstract

The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent. However, how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood. A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations. Hence, reviewing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 377 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 1%
Canada 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 365 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 76 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 17%
Researcher 50 13%
Student > Bachelor 34 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 8%
Other 68 18%
Unknown 56 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 134 36%
Sports and Recreations 44 12%
Psychology 40 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 10%
Social Sciences 15 4%
Other 42 11%
Unknown 66 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2018.
All research outputs
#780,785
of 16,623,170 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,081
of 11,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,110
of 172,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,623,170 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,545 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.