| Title |
Physical training for asthma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001116.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristin V Carson, Madhu G Chandratilleke, Joanna Picot, Malcolm P Brinn, Adrian J Esterman, Brian J Smith |
| Abstract |
People with asthma may show less tolerance to exercise due to worsening asthma symptoms during exercise or other reasons such as deconditioning as a consequence of inactivity. Some may restrict activities as per medical advice or family influence and this might result in reduced physical fitness. Physical training programs aim to improve physical fitness, neuromuscular coordination and self confidence. Subjectively, many people with asthma report that they are symptomatically better when fit, but results from trials have varied and have been difficult to compare because of different designs and training protocols. Also, as exercise can induce asthma, the safety of exercise programmes needs to be considered. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 11% |
| Australia | 2 | 7% |
| Spain | 2 | 7% |
| South Africa | 2 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 56% |
| Scientists | 6 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 343 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 340 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 56 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 55 | 16% |
| Researcher | 32 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 48 | 14% |
| Unknown | 110 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 99 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 51 | 15% |
| Sports and Recreations | 21 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 4% |
| Psychology | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 7% |
| Unknown | 123 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2023.
All research outputs
#818,648
of 24,804,602 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,630
of 12,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,128
of 212,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,804,602 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,977 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.