↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Addition of anti-leukotriene agents to inhaled corticosteroids in children with persistent asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
78 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Addition of anti-leukotriene agents to inhaled corticosteroids in children with persistent asthma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009585.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bhupendrasinh F Chauhan, Raja Ben Salah, Francine M Ducharme

Abstract

In the treatment of children with mild persistent asthma, low-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are recommended as the preferred monotherapy (referred to as step 2 of therapy). In children with inadequate asthma control on low doses of ICS (step 2), asthma management guidelines recommend adding an anti-leukotriene agent to existing ICS as one of three therapeutic options to intensify therapy (step 3).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 106 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 20%
Student > Bachelor 17 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Other 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 24 22%
Unknown 22 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 15%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 25 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2018.
All research outputs
#560,769
of 21,347,834 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,175
of 12,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,183
of 187,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,347,834 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.