↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Face‐to‐face interventions for promoting physical activity

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
38 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
328 Mendeley
Title
Face‐to‐face interventions for promoting physical activity
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010392.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richards J, Hillsdon M, Thorogood M, Foster C, Richards, Justin, Hillsdon, Melvyn, Thorogood, Margaret, Foster, Charles

Abstract

Face-to-face interventions for promoting physical activity (PA) are continuing to be popular but their ability to achieve long term changes are unknown.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 328 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 319 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 61 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 15%
Researcher 45 14%
Student > Bachelor 35 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 7%
Other 62 19%
Unknown 53 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 101 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 13%
Psychology 33 10%
Sports and Recreations 24 7%
Social Sciences 23 7%
Other 37 11%
Unknown 66 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2015.
All research outputs
#695,226
of 15,250,096 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,984
of 11,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,966
of 168,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,250,096 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.