| Title |
Beta2-agonists for exercise-induced asthma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003564.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matteo Bonini, Corrado Di Mambro, Moises A Calderon, Enrico Compalati, Holger Schünemann, Stephen Durham, Giorgio W Canonica |
| Abstract |
It is well known that physical exercise can trigger asthma symptoms and can induce bronchial obstruction in people without clinical asthma. International guidelines on asthma management recommend the use of beta2-agonists at any stage of the disease. At present, however, no consensus has been reached about the efficacy and safety of beta2-agonists in the pretreatment of exercise-induced asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. For the purpose of the present review, both of these conditions are referred to by the acronymous EIA, independently from the presence of an underlying chronic clinical disease. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 12% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 17 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 210 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 10% |
| Researcher | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 36 | 17% |
| Unknown | 76 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 9% |
| Unknown | 85 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2022.
All research outputs
#864,806
of 24,138,997 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,775
of 12,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,855
of 212,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,138,997 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.