↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: hyperbaric oxygen therapy for irradiated patients who require dental implants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
30 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: hyperbaric oxygen therapy for irradiated patients who require dental implants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003603.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Esposito, Helen V Worthington

Abstract

Dental implants offer one way to replace missing teeth. Patients who have undergone radiotherapy and those who have also undergone surgery for cancer in the head and neck region may particularly benefit from reconstruction with implants. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO) has been advocated to improve the success of implant treatment in patients who have undergone radiotherapy but this remains a controversial issue.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 214 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 24%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 9%
Student > Bachelor 18 8%
Student > Postgraduate 17 8%
Other 39 18%
Unknown 48 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 127 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 1%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 58 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2017.
All research outputs
#1,022,030
of 18,891,791 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,562
of 11,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,778
of 181,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,891,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.