↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: hyperbaric oxygen therapy for irradiated patients who require dental implants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
31 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
223 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: hyperbaric oxygen therapy for irradiated patients who require dental implants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003603.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Esposito, Helen V Worthington

Abstract

Dental implants offer one way to replace missing teeth. Patients who have undergone radiotherapy and those who have also undergone surgery for cancer in the head and neck region may particularly benefit from reconstruction with implants. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO) has been advocated to improve the success of implant treatment in patients who have undergone radiotherapy but this remains a controversial issue.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 219 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 24%
Researcher 25 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 9%
Student > Postgraduate 18 8%
Student > Bachelor 18 8%
Other 40 18%
Unknown 49 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 132 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 59 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2017.
All research outputs
#1,012,594
of 18,978,726 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,537
of 11,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,649
of 181,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,978,726 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.