↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Chinese herbal medicine for diabetic peripheral neuropathy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
Title
Chinese herbal medicine for diabetic peripheral neuropathy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007796.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wei Chen, Yin Zhang, Xinxue Li, Guoyan Yang, Jian Ping Liu

Abstract

Chinese herbal medicine is frequently used for treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy in China. Many controlled trials have been undertaken to investigate its efficacy.This is an update of a Cochrane review that was first published in the year 2011.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 180 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 25 14%
Student > Master 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 8%
Other 42 23%
Unknown 41 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 50 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2013.
All research outputs
#1,972,065
of 22,026,693 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,358
of 12,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,920
of 187,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#34
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,026,693 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.