↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Chinese herbal medicine for diabetic peripheral neuropathy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
Title
Chinese herbal medicine for diabetic peripheral neuropathy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007796.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wei Chen, Yin Zhang, Xinxue Li, Guoyan Yang, Jian Ping Liu

Abstract

Chinese herbal medicine is frequently used for treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy in China. Many controlled trials have been undertaken to investigate its efficacy.This is an update of a Cochrane review that was first published in the year 2011.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 193 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 25 13%
Student > Master 17 9%
Other 14 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 7%
Other 46 24%
Unknown 52 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 62 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2013.
All research outputs
#2,466,019
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,993
of 11,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,044
of 221,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#101
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.