| Title |
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for improving function after stroke
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008862.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zilong Hao, Deren Wang, Yan Zeng, Ming Liu |
| Abstract |
It had been assumed that suppressing the undamaged contralesional motor cortex by repetitive low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) or increasing the excitability of the damaged hemisphere cortex by high-frequency rTMS will promote function recovery after stroke. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 60% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 231 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 39 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 39 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 34 | 15% |
| Unknown | 52 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 24% |
| Neuroscience | 33 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 7% |
| Psychology | 14 | 6% |
| Engineering | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 33 | 14% |
| Unknown | 74 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,624,336
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,469
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,337
of 207,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#78
of 281 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 281 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.