↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for improving function after stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
5 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
184 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
231 Mendeley
Title
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for improving function after stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008862.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zilong Hao, Deren Wang, Yan Zeng, Ming Liu

Abstract

It had been assumed that suppressing the undamaged contralesional motor cortex by repetitive low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) or increasing the excitability of the damaged hemisphere cortex by high-frequency rTMS will promote function recovery after stroke.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 228 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 17%
Student > Master 39 17%
Student > Bachelor 28 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Other 34 15%
Unknown 50 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 24%
Neuroscience 33 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 7%
Psychology 14 6%
Engineering 9 4%
Other 32 14%
Unknown 72 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,612,766
of 25,382,360 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,482
of 12,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,224
of 206,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#77
of 269 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 269 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.