↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for improving function after stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
5 tweeters
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
Title
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for improving function after stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008862.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zilong Hao, Deren Wang, Yan Zeng, Ming Liu

Abstract

It had been assumed that suppressing the undamaged contralesional motor cortex by repetitive low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) or increasing the excitability of the damaged hemisphere cortex by high-frequency rTMS will promote function recovery after stroke.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 175 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 19%
Student > Master 33 19%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 10%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 22 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 28%
Neuroscience 30 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 8%
Psychology 9 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 41 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2019.
All research outputs
#804,121
of 14,674,316 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,371
of 11,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,483
of 166,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,674,316 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,038 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.