The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Interventions for central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) of the jaws
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007404.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
María de Lourdes Suárez‐Roa, Ludovic Reveiz, Luz María Ruíz‐Godoy Rivera, Juan Asbun‐Bojalil, José Eduardo Dávila‐Serapio, Andrés H Menjívar‐Rubio, Abelardo Meneses‐García |
| Abstract |
Central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) of the jaws is a rare benign tumour with an unknown aetiology accounting for up to 7% of tumours in the mandible (lower jaw) and the maxilla (upper jaw). |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| India | 1 | 17% |
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 146 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 14% |
| Researcher | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 29 | 20% |
| Unknown | 38 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 58% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
| Psychology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 44 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2019.
All research outputs
#4,898,678
of 26,180,771 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,140
of 13,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,727
of 109,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#29
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,180,771 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.