↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) of the jaws

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) of the jaws
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007404.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

María de Lourdes Suárez‐Roa, Ludovic Reveiz, Luz María Ruíz‐Godoy Rivera, Juan Asbun‐Bojalil, José Eduardo Dávila‐Serapio, Andrés H Menjívar‐Rubio, Abelardo Meneses‐García

Abstract

Central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) of the jaws is a rare benign tumour with an unknown aetiology accounting for up to 7% of tumours in the mandible (lower jaw) and the maxilla (upper jaw).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 139 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 16%
Student > Bachelor 20 14%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 8%
Other 26 19%
Unknown 34 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 59%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Computer Science 3 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 <1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 39 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2019.
All research outputs
#4,684,862
of 25,390,203 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,080
of 12,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,038
of 105,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#29
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,390,203 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.6. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.