↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Micronutrient supplementation for children with HIV infection

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
318 Mendeley
Title
Micronutrient supplementation for children with HIV infection
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010666
Pubmed ID
Authors

James H Irlam, Nandi Siegfried, Marianne E Visser, Nigel C Rollins

Abstract

Micronutrient deficiencies are widespread and compound the effects of HIV disease in children, especially in poor communities. Micronutrient supplements may be effective and safe in reducing the burden of HIV disease. This review is an update of an earlier Cochrane review of micronutrient supplementation in children and adults which found that vitamin A and zinc are beneficial and safe in children exposed to HIV and living with HIV infection (Irlam 2010).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 318 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 312 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 55 17%
Student > Bachelor 41 13%
Researcher 39 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 9%
Other 23 7%
Other 71 22%
Unknown 61 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 113 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 45 14%
Social Sciences 19 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Other 44 14%
Unknown 75 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2020.
All research outputs
#6,930,372
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,558
of 12,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,683
of 210,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#152
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.