↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute gallstone pancreatitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
231 Mendeley
Title
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute gallstone pancreatitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010326.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Myura Nagendran, Brian R Davidson

Abstract

Gallstones and alcohol account for more than 80% of acute pancreatitis. Cholecystectomy is the definitive treatment for gallstones. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the preferred route for performing cholecystectomy. The timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after an attack of acute biliary pancreatitis is controversial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 226 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 15%
Other 24 10%
Student > Postgraduate 23 10%
Researcher 22 10%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Other 54 23%
Unknown 52 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 138 60%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 1%
Arts and Humanities 3 1%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 62 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2014.
All research outputs
#20,723,696
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,914
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,211
of 210,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#214
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.