↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Wound drainage after axillary dissection for carcinoma of the breast

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
Title
Wound drainage after axillary dissection for carcinoma of the breast
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006823.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

David R Thomson, Hazim Sadideen, Dominic Furniss

Abstract

Axillary dissection is commonly performed for breast carcinoma. It is uncertain whether insertion of a drain reduces complication rates.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 155 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 15%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 6%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 49 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 12%
Psychology 5 3%
Unspecified 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 49 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2017.
All research outputs
#15,283,138
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,780
of 12,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,479
of 211,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#187
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.