↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

'Third wave' cognitive and behavioural therapies versus treatment as usual for depression

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
608 Mendeley
Title
'Third wave' cognitive and behavioural therapies versus treatment as usual for depression
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008705.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel Churchill, Theresa HM Moore, Toshi A Furukawa, Deborah M Caldwell, Philippa Davies, Hannah Jones, Kiyomi Shinohara, Hissei Imai, Glyn Lewis, Vivien Hunot

Abstract

So-called 'third wave' cognitive and behavioural therapies represent a new generation of psychological therapies that are increasingly being used in the treatment of psychological problems. However, the effectiveness and acceptability of third-wave cognitive and behavioural therapy (CBT) approaches as treatment for acute depression remain unclear.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 608 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 598 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 101 17%
Student > Bachelor 73 12%
Researcher 71 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 52 9%
Other 108 18%
Unknown 136 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 189 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 122 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 41 7%
Social Sciences 28 5%
Neuroscience 13 2%
Other 48 8%
Unknown 167 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,898,966
of 25,956,379 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,524
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,804
of 225,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#99
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,956,379 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.