↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

'Third wave' cognitive and behavioural therapies versus treatment as usual for depression

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
454 Mendeley
Title
'Third wave' cognitive and behavioural therapies versus treatment as usual for depression
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008705.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel Churchill, Theresa HM Moore, Toshi A Furukawa, Deborah M Caldwell, Philippa Davies, Hannah Jones, Kiyomi Shinohara, Hissei Imai, Glyn Lewis, Vivien Hunot

Abstract

So-called 'third wave' cognitive and behavioural therapies represent a new generation of psychological therapies that are increasingly being used in the treatment of psychological problems. However, the effectiveness and acceptability of third-wave cognitive and behavioural therapy (CBT) approaches as treatment for acute depression remain unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 454 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 444 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 79 17%
Researcher 66 15%
Student > Bachelor 60 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 47 10%
Other 82 18%
Unknown 63 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 161 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 106 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 7%
Social Sciences 23 5%
Neuroscience 9 2%
Other 37 8%
Unknown 84 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,145,644
of 17,623,290 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,819
of 11,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,253
of 195,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,623,290 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,724 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.