↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Corticosteroids for pneumonia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
5 blogs
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Corticosteroids for pneumonia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007720.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuanjing Chen, Ka Li, Hongshan Pu, Taixiang Wu

Abstract

Pneumonia is an acute inflammation of the lungs and treatments differ depending on the type and severity. Corticosteroids can influence immune regulation, carbohydrate metabolism, protein catabolism, electrolyte balance and stress response. However, the benefits of corticosteroids for patients with pneumonia remains unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Portugal 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 82 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 17%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Other 8 9%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 11 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 62%
Psychology 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 13 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,101,312
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,483
of 12,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,223
of 108,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.