↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non-pharmacological interventions for managing delirium in hospitalised patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Non-pharmacological interventions for managing delirium in hospitalised patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005995.pub2
Authors

Elizabeth A Teale, Najma Siddiqi, Andrew Clegg, Oliver M Todd, John Young

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Other 3 4%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 19 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 24%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 21 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2017.
All research outputs
#4,312,748
of 21,752,314 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,718
of 12,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,395
of 284,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#163
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,752,314 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.