↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non‐pharmacological interventions for managing delirium in hospitalised patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
Non‐pharmacological interventions for managing delirium in hospitalised patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005995.pub2
Authors

Elizabeth A Teale, Najma Siddiqi, Andrew Clegg, Oliver M Todd, John Young

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 3 4%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 24 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 25%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 26 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2017.
All research outputs
#5,333,984
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,345
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,327
of 325,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#163
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.