The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 178 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001431.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dawn Stacey, France Légaré, Krystina Lewis, Michael J Barry, Carol L Bennett, Karen B Eden, Margaret Holmes-Rovner, Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas, Anne Lyddiatt, Richard Thomson, Lyndal Trevena |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 6% |
| Canada | 9 | 5% |
| Australia | 8 | 4% |
| France | 8 | 4% |
| Spain | 5 | 3% |
| Norway | 2 | 1% |
| Djibouti | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 117 | 66% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 114 | 64% |
| Scientists | 37 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 25 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,433 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2430 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 349 | 14% |
| Researcher | 261 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 237 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 218 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 144 | 6% |
| Other | 473 | 19% |
| Unknown | 751 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 660 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 342 | 14% |
| Psychology | 129 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 116 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 33 | 1% |
| Other | 278 | 11% |
| Unknown | 875 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 299. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2024.
All research outputs
#122,513
of 26,371,446 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#219
of 13,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,690
of 328,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 260 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,371,446 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 260 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.