↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antibiotic prophylaxis for mammalian bites

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
156 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Antibiotic prophylaxis for mammalian bites
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2001
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001738
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iara Marques Medeiros, Humberto Saconato

Abstract

Bites by mammals are a common problem and they account for up to 1% of all visits to hospital emergency rooms. Dog and cat bites are the most common and people are usually bitten by their own pets or by an animal known to them. School-age children make up almost a half of those bitten. Prevention of tetanus, rabies and wound infection are the priorities for staff in emergency rooms. The use of antibiotics may be useful to reduce the risk of developing a wound infection.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Chile 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 166 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 27 16%
Student > Postgraduate 21 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Student > Master 18 11%
Researcher 15 9%
Other 39 23%
Unknown 32 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 109 64%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 41 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2020.
All research outputs
#525,658
of 18,792,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,173
of 11,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,013
of 199,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,792,779 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.