The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003452.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Badri Thiruvenkatachari, Jayne E Harrison, Helen V Worthington, Kevin D O'Brien |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 22% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Bahrain | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 43% |
| Members of the public | 9 | 39% |
| Scientists | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 316 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 314 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 50 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 48 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 6% |
| Researcher | 19 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 71 | 22% |
| Unknown | 89 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 165 | 52% |
| Unspecified | 13 | 4% |
| Psychology | 8 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 5% |
| Unknown | 101 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,175,710
of 26,362,953 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,252
of 13,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,118
of 226,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#47
of 251 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,362,953 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 251 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.