| Title |
Arthroscopic debridement for knee osteoarthritis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005118.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wiroon Laupattarakasem, Malinee Laopaiboon, Pisamai Laupattarakasem, Chut Sumananont |
| Abstract |
Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a progressive disease that initially affects the articular cartilage. Observational studies have shown benefits for arthroscopic debridement (AD) on the osteoarthritic knee, but other recent studies have yielded conflicting results that suggest AD may not be effective. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Italy | 1 | 33% |
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 319 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 312 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 60 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 11% |
| Researcher | 30 | 9% |
| Other | 25 | 8% |
| Other | 62 | 19% |
| Unknown | 64 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 133 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 4% |
| Engineering | 10 | 3% |
| Psychology | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 53 | 17% |
| Unknown | 78 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,190,754
of 23,505,669 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,753
of 12,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,580
of 158,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,505,669 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.