↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Critical incident audit and feedback to improve perinatal and maternal mortality and morbidity

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Critical incident audit and feedback to improve perinatal and maternal mortality and morbidity
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002961.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert C Pattinson, Lale Say, JD Makin, Maria Helena Bastos

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 142 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 14%
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 36 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 16%
Social Sciences 14 9%
Psychology 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 37 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2018.
All research outputs
#15,453,139
of 22,963,381 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,816
of 12,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,967
of 59,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,963,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.