| Title |
Cognitive rehabilitation for attention deficits following stroke
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002842.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tobias Loetscher, Nadina B Lincoln |
| Abstract |
Many survivors of stroke complain about attentional impairments, such as diminished concentration and mental slowness. However, the effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation for improving these impairments is uncertain. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 25% |
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 267 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 52 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 11% |
| Researcher | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 56 | 21% |
| Unknown | 60 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 63 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 24 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 11% |
| Unknown | 64 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,066,499
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,482
of 12,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,596
of 194,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#100
of 277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.