↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Enamel etching for bonding fixed orthodontic braces

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
26 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
Title
Enamel etching for bonding fixed orthodontic braces
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005516.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Haikun Hu, Chunjie Li, Fan Li, Jianwei Chen, Jianfeng Sun, Shujuan Zou, Andrew Sandham, Qiang Xu, Philip Riley, Qingsong Ye

Abstract

Acid etching of tooth surfaces to promote the bonding of orthodontic attachments to the enamel has been a routine procedure in orthodontic treatment since the 1960s. Various types of orthodontic etchants and etching techniques have been introduced in the past five decades. Although a large amount of information on this topic has been published, there is a significant lack of consensus regarding the clinical effects of different dental etchants and etching techniques.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 214 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 17%
Researcher 21 10%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Student > Postgraduate 19 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 7%
Other 42 20%
Unknown 61 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 101 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Psychology 6 3%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 67 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,169,726
of 22,733,113 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,674
of 12,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,880
of 304,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#48
of 227 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,733,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 227 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.