↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Domiciliary oxygen for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
171 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
Title
Domiciliary oxygen for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001744.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Josephine M Cranston, Alan Crockett, John Moss, John H Alpers

Abstract

Domiciliary oxygen therapy has become one of the major forms of treatment for hypoxaemic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 149 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 15%
Student > Master 22 14%
Researcher 20 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 10%
Student > Postgraduate 14 9%
Other 31 20%
Unknown 29 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 36 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,057,036
of 17,730,520 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,729
of 11,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,870
of 273,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,730,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,742 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.