↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Domiciliary oxygen for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
169 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
Title
Domiciliary oxygen for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001744.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Josephine M Cranston, Alan Crockett, John Moss, John H Alpers

Abstract

Domiciliary oxygen therapy has become one of the major forms of treatment for hypoxaemic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 151 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 15%
Student > Master 23 15%
Researcher 20 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 10%
Student > Postgraduate 14 9%
Other 32 20%
Unknown 29 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 36 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,019,743
of 18,990,581 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,558
of 11,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,552
of 284,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,990,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.