↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intranasal steroids for acute sinusitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Intranasal steroids for acute sinusitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005149.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anca Zalmanovici Trestioreanu, John Yaphe

Abstract

Acute sinusitis is a common reason for primary care visits. It causes significant symptoms and often results in time off work and school.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 202 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 15%
Researcher 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 9%
Other 15 7%
Other 39 19%
Unknown 60 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 6%
Psychology 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 70 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2017.
All research outputs
#1,375,244
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,919
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,768
of 321,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#56
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.