↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intranasal steroids for acute sinusitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Intranasal steroids for acute sinusitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005149.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anca Zalmanovici Trestioreanu, John Yaphe

Abstract

Acute sinusitis is a common reason for primary care visits. It causes significant symptoms and often results in time off work and school.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 196 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 14%
Researcher 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 9%
Other 15 8%
Other 40 20%
Unknown 55 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 6%
Psychology 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 64 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2017.
All research outputs
#1,369,205
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,908
of 11,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,747
of 320,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#56
of 209 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 209 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.