↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intranasal steroids for acute sinusitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Intranasal steroids for acute sinusitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005149.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anca Zalmanovici Trestioreanu, John Yaphe

Abstract

Acute sinusitis is a common reason for primary care visits. It causes significant symptoms and often results in time off work and school.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 143 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 18%
Researcher 22 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Other 13 9%
Other 33 22%
Unknown 22 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Psychology 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 31 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2018.
All research outputs
#841,326
of 17,954,410 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,124
of 11,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,310
of 275,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,954,410 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,789 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.