The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Prophylactic antibiotics for inhibiting preterm labour with intact membranes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000246.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vicki Flenady, Glenda Hawley, Owen M Stock, Sara Kenyon, Nadia Badawi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 38% |
| Mexico | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 410 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 404 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 58 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 12% |
| Researcher | 45 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 6% |
| Other | 83 | 20% |
| Unknown | 107 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 159 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 6% |
| Psychology | 14 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 45 | 11% |
| Unknown | 121 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2014.
All research outputs
#5,541,859
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,711
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,249
of 322,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#144
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.