↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Catheter policies for management of long term voiding problems in adults with neurogenic bladder disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 tweeter
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
Catheter policies for management of long term voiding problems in adults with neurogenic bladder disorders
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004375.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jim Jamison, Suzanne Maguire, John McCann

Abstract

Management of the neurogenic bladder has the primary objectives of maintaining continence, ensuring low bladder pressure (to avoid renal damage) and avoiding or minimising infection. Options include intermittent urethral catheterisation, indwelling urethral or suprapubic catheterisation, timed voiding, use of external catheter (for men), drug treatment, augmentation cystoplasty and urinary diversion.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Singapore 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 87 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 15%
Student > Master 14 15%
Other 11 12%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 21 23%
Unknown 19 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 15%
Engineering 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 24 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2015.
All research outputs
#1,876,244
of 20,990,430 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,251
of 12,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,354
of 302,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,990,430 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.