↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Diclofenac with or without an antiemetic for acute migraine headaches in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
Title
Diclofenac with or without an antiemetic for acute migraine headaches in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008783.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sheena Derry, Roy Rabbie, R Andrew Moore

Abstract

This review is an update of a previously published review in Issue 2, 2012 (Derry 2012a). Migraine is a common, disabling condition and a burden for the individual, health services and society. Many sufferers choose not to, or are unable to, seek professional help and rely on over-the-counter (OTC) analgesics. Diclofenac is an established analgesic, and new formulations using the potassium or epolamine salts, which can be dissolved in water, have been developed for rapid absorption, which may be beneficial in acute migraine. Co-therapy with an antiemetic should help to reduce the nausea and vomiting commonly associated with migraine.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 154 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 17%
Student > Bachelor 22 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Researcher 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 41 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 42%
Psychology 10 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 45 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,088,330
of 22,026,693 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,580
of 12,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,173
of 307,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,026,693 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.