↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Rehabilitation following surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
Title
Rehabilitation following surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009644.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alison H McGregor, Katrin Probyn, Suzie Cro, Caroline J Doré, A Kim Burton, Federico Balagué, Tamar Pincus, Jeremy Fairbank

Abstract

Lumbar spinal stenosis is a common cause of back pain that can also give rise to pain in the buttock, thigh or leg, particularly when walking. Several possible treatments are available, of which surgery appears to be best at restoring function and reducing pain. Surgical outcome is not ideal, and a sizeable proportion of patients do not regain good function. No accepted evidence-based approach to postoperative care is known-a fact thathas prompted this review.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 244 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 14%
Researcher 28 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 10%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 8%
Other 50 20%
Unknown 66 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 13%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Sports and Recreations 8 3%
Psychology 8 3%
Other 31 13%
Unknown 76 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,344,333
of 21,464,861 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,172
of 12,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,551
of 303,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,464,861 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,059 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.