↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Treatment of hypertension in peripheral arterial disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Treatment of hypertension in peripheral arterial disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003075.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deirdre A Lane, Gregory YH Lip

Abstract

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) causes considerable morbidity and mortality. Hypertension is a risk factor for PAD. Treatment for hypertension must be compatible with the symptoms of PAD. Controversy regarding the effects of beta-adrenoreceptor blockade for hypertension in patients with PAD has led many physicians to stop prescribing beta-adrenoreceptor blockers. Little is known about the effects of other classes of anti-hypertensive drugs in the presence of PAD. This is the second update of a Cochrane review first published in 2003.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 270 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 16%
Student > Bachelor 38 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 9%
Researcher 22 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Other 43 16%
Unknown 84 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 115 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Psychology 5 2%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 101 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,307,196
of 26,123,112 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,688
of 13,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,370
of 323,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#160
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,123,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.