The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Optimum duration of regimens for <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> eradication
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008337.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yuhong Yuan, Alex C Ford, Khurram J Khan, Javier P Gisbert, David Forman, Grigorios I Leontiadis, Frances Tse, Xavier Calvet, Carlo Fallone, Lori Fischbach, Giuseppina Oderda, Franco Bazzoli, Paul Moayyedi |
| Abstract |
The optimal duration for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapy is controversial, with recommendations ranging from 7 to 14 days. Several systematic reviews have attempted to address this issue but have given conflicting results and limited their analysis to proton pump inhibitor (PPI), two antibiotics (PPI triple) therapy. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the optimal duration of multiple H. pylori eradication regimens. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 17 | 28% |
| Canada | 4 | 7% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 32 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 90% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 349 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Guatemala | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 345 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 56 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 12% |
| Other | 29 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 8% |
| Researcher | 25 | 7% |
| Other | 77 | 22% |
| Unknown | 93 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 139 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 18 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 42 | 12% |
| Unknown | 112 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2023.
All research outputs
#809,991
of 26,183,699 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,450
of 13,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,130
of 323,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,183,699 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.