↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Optimum duration of regimens forHelicobacter pylorieradication

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
65 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
293 Mendeley
Title
Optimum duration of regimens forHelicobacter pylorieradication
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008337.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuhong Yuan, Alex C Ford, Khurram J Khan, Javier P Gisbert, David Forman, Grigorios I Leontiadis, Frances Tse, Xavier Calvet, Carlo Fallone, Lori Fischbach, Giuseppina Oderda, Franco Bazzoli, Paul Moayyedi

Abstract

The optimal duration for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapy is controversial, with recommendations ranging from 7 to 14 days. Several systematic reviews have attempted to address this issue but have given conflicting results and limited their analysis to proton pump inhibitor (PPI), two antibiotics (PPI triple) therapy. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the optimal duration of multiple H. pylori eradication regimens.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Guatemala 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 289 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 51 17%
Student > Master 40 14%
Other 25 9%
Researcher 25 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 7%
Other 65 22%
Unknown 66 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 126 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Other 36 12%
Unknown 79 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2020.
All research outputs
#613,895
of 22,230,789 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,249
of 12,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,256
of 308,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,230,789 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.