↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Wound drainage for caesarean section

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
Title
Wound drainage for caesarean section
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004549.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon Gates, Elizabeth R Anderson

Abstract

Subcutaneous and sub rectus sheath wound drains are sometimes used in women who have undergone caesarean section. The indications for using drains vary by clinician.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Unknown 153 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 14%
Other 17 11%
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Master 13 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 33 21%
Unknown 45 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 18%
Psychology 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 52 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2020.
All research outputs
#6,783,328
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,921
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,441
of 320,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#155
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.