↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Wound drainage for caesarean section

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
Title
Wound drainage for caesarean section
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004549.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon Gates, Elizabeth R Anderson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Unknown 162 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Other 17 10%
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Master 14 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 35 21%
Unknown 51 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 18%
Psychology 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 58 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2020.
All research outputs
#6,981,937
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,437
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,790
of 324,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#156
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.