↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Combination formoterol and budesonide as maintenance and reliever therapy versus combination inhaler maintenance for chronic asthma in adults and children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
29 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
326 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Combination formoterol and budesonide as maintenance and reliever therapy versus combination inhaler maintenance for chronic asthma in adults and children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009019.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kayleigh M Kew, Charlotta Karner, Stephanie M Mindus, Giovanni Ferrara

Abstract

Asthma is characterised by chronic inflammation of the airways and recurrent exacerbations with wheezing, chest tightness and cough. Treatment with inhaled steroids and bronchodilators often results in good control of symptoms, prevention of further morbidity and mortality and improved quality of life. Several steroids and beta2-agonists (long- and short-acting) as well as combinations of these treatments are available in a single inhaler to be used once or twice a day, with a separate inhaler for relief of symptoms when needed (for patients in Step three or higher, according to Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines). Budesonide/formoterol is also licenced for use as maintenance and reliever therapy from a single inhaler (SiT; sometimes referred to as SMART therapy). SiT can be prescribed at a lower dose than other combination therapy because of the additional steroid doses being received as reliever therapy. It has been suggested that using SiT improves compliance and hence reduces symptoms and exacerbations, but it is unclear whether it increases side effects associated with the use of inhaled steroids.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 326 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Tunisia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 319 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 14%
Student > Bachelor 36 11%
Researcher 34 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 9%
Other 23 7%
Other 71 22%
Unknown 89 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 137 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 5%
Psychology 14 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Other 30 9%
Unknown 95 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2020.
All research outputs
#982,264
of 20,639,027 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,334
of 12,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,338
of 261,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,639,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,097 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.