↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for promoting physical activity in people with cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
375 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for promoting physical activity in people with cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009448.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Narelle S Cox, Jennifer A Alison, Anne E Holland, Rachel Schembri

Abstract

In individuals with cystic fibrosis there are no established targets for participation in physical activity, nor have any ideal strategies to promote participation in physical activity been identified

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 375 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Ireland 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 367 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 69 18%
Researcher 39 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 10%
Student > Bachelor 36 10%
Other 23 6%
Other 61 16%
Unknown 111 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 97 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 56 15%
Psychology 19 5%
Social Sciences 13 3%
Sports and Recreations 13 3%
Other 50 13%
Unknown 127 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2016.
All research outputs
#2,759,857
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,381
of 11,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,660
of 320,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#107
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.