↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Bone marrow harvest versus peripheral stem cell collection for haemopoietic stem cell donation in healthy donors

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Bone marrow harvest versus peripheral stem cell collection for haemopoietic stem cell donation in healthy donors
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006406.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samreen Siddiq, Derwood Pamphilon, Susan Brunskill, Carolyn Doree, Chris Hyde, Simon Stanworth

Abstract

Haemopoietic stem cells can be collected from a donor either as a bone marrow harvest or by peripheral blood collection. Both techniques have risks for the donor.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 244 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 17%
Student > Bachelor 31 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 10%
Researcher 21 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 48 19%
Unknown 68 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 10%
Psychology 19 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 74 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2013.
All research outputs
#22,830,981
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,281
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,169
of 184,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#79
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.