↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Management strategies for pancreatic pseudocysts

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
250 Mendeley
Title
Management strategies for pancreatic pseudocysts
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011392.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Elena Pallari, Neil Hawkins, Stephen P Pereira, Brian R Davidson

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 249 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 33 13%
Other 29 12%
Student > Master 29 12%
Student > Bachelor 25 10%
Researcher 20 8%
Other 59 24%
Unknown 55 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 120 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 28 11%
Unknown 71 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2019.
All research outputs
#7,629,858
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,008
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,836
of 319,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#198
of 284 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 284 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.