↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Behavioral interventions for improving condom use for dual protection

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
320 Mendeley
Title
Behavioral interventions for improving condom use for dual protection
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010662.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laureen M Lopez, Conrad Otterness, Mario Chen, Markus Steiner, Maria F Gallo

Abstract

Unprotected sex is a major risk factor for disease, disability, and mortality in many areas of the world due to the prevalence and incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STI) including HIV. The male condom is one of the oldest contraceptive methods and the earliest method for preventing the spread of HIV. When used correctly and consistently, condoms can provide dual protection, i.e., against both pregnancy and HIV/STI.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 320 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 315 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 65 20%
Researcher 39 12%
Student > Bachelor 34 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 9%
Other 18 6%
Other 54 17%
Unknown 82 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 97 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 13%
Social Sciences 30 9%
Psychology 22 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Other 26 8%
Unknown 97 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2023.
All research outputs
#6,247,469
of 25,460,914 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,647
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,620
of 225,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#148
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.