↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Passive movements for the treatment and prevention of contractures

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
34 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
349 Mendeley
Title
Passive movements for the treatment and prevention of contractures
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009331.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rama KR Prabhu, Narasimman Swaminathan, Lisa A Harvey

Abstract

Contractures, a common complication following immobility, lead to restricted joint range of motion. Passive movements (PMs) are widely used for the treatment and prevention of contractures; however, it is not clear whether they are effective.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 349 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 338 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 80 23%
Student > Bachelor 48 14%
Researcher 45 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 7%
Student > Postgraduate 22 6%
Other 68 19%
Unknown 60 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 125 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 65 19%
Neuroscience 13 4%
Sports and Recreations 13 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Other 41 12%
Unknown 81 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2020.
All research outputs
#729,677
of 18,057,469 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,798
of 11,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,760
of 276,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,057,469 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,815 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.