| Title |
Music for stress and anxiety reduction in coronary heart disease patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006577.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joke Bradt, Cheryl Dileo, Noah Potvin |
| Abstract |
Individuals with coronary heart disease (CHD) often suffer from severe distress due to diagnosis, hospitalization, surgical procedures, uncertainty of outcome, fear of dying, doubts about progress in recovery, helplessness and loss of control. Such adverse effects put the cardiac patient at greater risk for complications, including sudden cardiac death. It is therefore of crucial importance that the care of people with CHD focuses on psychological as well as physiological needs.Music interventions have been used to reduce anxiety and distress and improve physiological functioning in medical patients; however its efficacy for people with CHD needs to be evaluated. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 20% |
| Canada | 3 | 15% |
| Chile | 1 | 5% |
| Russia | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 15% |
| Scientists | 3 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 824 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 812 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 120 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 100 | 12% |
| Researcher | 70 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 70 | 8% |
| Other | 52 | 6% |
| Other | 145 | 18% |
| Unknown | 267 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 197 | 24% |
| Psychology | 100 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 92 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 34 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 18 | 2% |
| Other | 93 | 11% |
| Unknown | 290 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 115. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2023.
All research outputs
#371,449
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#635
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,420
of 321,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.